Optimization and qualification of an assay that demonstrates that a FimH vaccine induces functional antibody responses in women with histories of urinary tract infections

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Jan 2;17(1):283-292. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1770034. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

Abstract

Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) are a serious disease associated with morbidities and mortality. Resistance to the standard of care antibiotics is now widespread because of the continued use of antibiotics among people who suffer from rUTI. We are therefore developing a vaccine to prevent recurrences among patients with rUTI. The antigen of the vaccine is FimH, a bacterial adhesin protein, and the vaccine is adjuvanted with a TLR-4 agonist. In a Phase 1 clinical study evaluating the vaccine, immunized individuals produced FimH-binding antibodies. Here we describe the optimization, qualification, and use of an assay to assess the functionality of these anti-FimH antibodies. The suitability of the assay for its intended purpose was demonstrated by selectivity, specificity, sensitivity, and intra-assay and inter-assay precision. The acceptance criteria were achieved for all parameters including intra-assay precision with ≤10% relative standard deviations and inter-assay precision with ≤25% relative standard deviations. The results presented herein suggest this functional assay will be important for supporting the vaccine's efficacy in future human studies. Furthermore and of great significance, these results prove that vaccine-induced functional antibodies can be elicited in rUTI patients against an essential virulence factor, FimH.

Keywords: TLR-4 agonist; Urinary tract infection; fimH; functional assay; vaccine.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adhesins, Escherichia coli
  • Antibody Formation
  • Female
  • Fimbriae Proteins
  • Humans
  • Urinary Tract Infections* / prevention & control
  • Vaccines*

Substances

  • Adhesins, Escherichia coli
  • Vaccines
  • Fimbriae Proteins

Grants and funding

This study was funded by Sequoia Sciences. Employees of Sequoia Sciences are named as authors on this manuscript and contributed to the design, execution, and interpretation of experiments. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.