Focused Clinical Question: How should periodontal furcation defects be managed via periodontal regenerative therapy, and what parameters should be used for treatment selection? Summary: The treatment of furcation defects can vary based on the type and location of the furcation involvement. Attaining predictable regenerative outcomes is dependent on the control of local and systemic factors. A combined treatment approach (barrier and bone replacement graft with or without biologic) generally offers the better therapeutic outcome over monotherapy. Class I furcation defects can be managed via conventional periodontal non-surgical and/or surgical therapy, whereas Class II furcation defects generally attain better outcomes with regenerative therapy. There is weak evidence, limited to case reports, that Class III furcation defects can be treated successfully with regenerative therapy. Conclusions: In Class I furcation defects, regenerative therapy might be beneficial in certain clinical scenarios, although most Class I furcation defects can be treated successfully with non-regenerative therapy. For successful treatment of maxillary and mandibular molars with Class II furcation defects, systemic and local factors should be controlled, and surgical debridement and postoperative maintenance should be performed adequately. Although there is limited evidence for regeneration of Class III furcation defects, there may be a modest improvement allowing for tooth retention. Ultimately, the benefit of tooth retention and cost should be considered in the indication of therapy for teeth with severe furcation involvement.
Keywords: Evidence‐based dentistry; furcation defects; guided tissue regeneration; periodontal diseases; reconstructive surgical procedures; regeneration.
© 2015 American Academy of Periodontology.