Background: The study was designed to evaluate the ability of a novel electronic automatic notification system (EANS) to detect significant changes in transfusion-associated vital signs (VSs) during transfusion and to determine whether the EANS improved acute transfusion reaction (ATR) detection rates and suspected ATR reporting rates.
Study design and methods: VSs were measured three times per unit or batch product transfused:-before, 15 minutes after commencement, and at the completion of the transfusion-and recorded on the EANS. Significant changes in VSs were defined as increased temperature (≥38°C or ≥1°C change in baseline temperature), 20 mm Hg or 20% increase or decrease in systolic blood pressure, or 20% increase in pulse rate. The 6-month periods preceding and after the introduction of the EANS were defined as "before" and "after." Data from these periods were used for comparison and evaluation.
Results: During the after period, 945 notifications were reported from the EANS and 521 suspected ATR were detected. The suspected ATR reporting rates for the before and after were 0.29% (73/25 213) and 2.06% (521/25 304, P < .001) and the ATR detection rates before and after were 0.13% (33/25 213) and 0.49% (116/25 304, P < .001), respectively. Among 116 ATR cases, 49.1% could be detected only by significant changes in VSs.
Conclusion: The EANS was very effective in detecting ATRs that could have been overlooked by medical staff. Further data are needed to demonstrate the extent to which the introduction of an EANS may improve the safety of transfused patients.
© 2020 AABB.