Adsorption - Membrane process for treatment of stabilized municipal landfill leachate

Waste Manag. 2020 Aug 1:114:174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of removal of difficult-to-biodegrade organic compounds from real stabilized landfill leachate with a membrane process alone and in combination with powdered-activated-carbon (PAC) adsorption. For filtration, ceramic membranes were used. The characteristics of the raw leachate were 788 mg COD/L and color of 0.4458 cm-1. With all combinations of PAC-adsorption and a membrane process (MF, UF, fine-UF) and with fine-UF alone, leachate treatment was highly efficient. For each membrane, treatment was more efficient when the membrane process was combined with PAC addition. This means that adsorption (PAC dose 3 g/L, adsorption time 30 min) made the largest contribution to leachate treatment (COD and color removal efficiency of 73.1% and 94.4%, respectively). In all cases, organic particles bigger than 100 kDa were removed most efficiently, whereas particles smaller than 3 kDa were removed least efficiently. The efficiency of leachate treatment with PAC + MF, PAC + UF and PAC + fine-UF did not differ significantly (>87% COD and > 97% color). With regard to membrane flux, however, these combinations can be ranked in the following order: PAC + MF > PAC + UF > PAC + fine-UF. Therefore, PAC + MF (0.3 MPa) was selected as the most effective solution (COD and color removal efficiencies of 87.8% and 97.2%, respectively; permeate flux of 167.6 L/(m2∙h)), as it combined efficient pollutant removal with low membrane pressure.

Keywords: Ceramic membranes; Fine-ultrafiltration (fine-UF); Microfiltration (MF); Powdered activated carbon; Ultrafiltration (UF).

MeSH terms

  • Adsorption
  • Charcoal
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Ultrafiltration
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical*
  • Water Purification*

Substances

  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical
  • Charcoal