RABIES IMMUNOGLOBULIN: Brief history and recent experiences in Côte d'Ivoire

Acta Trop. 2020 Nov:211:105629. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105629. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

Abstract

Background: Rabies is a fatal viral zoonosis mainly transmitted via dog bites. The estimated 59'000 annual deaths caused by the disease are preventable through correct and timely administration of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). PEP should be initiated as soon as possible after an exposure to a rabies suspected animal and consists of a course of active vaccinations and administration of rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) in case of severe exposure. However, RIG is not accessible in most rabies endemic countries and its impact on survival in combination with modern vaccines and its cost-effectiveness is unclear. We examined the effect of equine RIG (eRIG) in a field-trial in Côte d'Ivoire, a developing country with low but chronic rabies burden and persistent lack of RIG, similar to a majority of rabies endemic countries attempting elimination of the disease.

Methods: Data from 3367 patients attending anti-rabies centers (Centres Anti-Rabiques, CARs) of the National Institute for Public Hygiene (Institut National d'Hygiène Publique, INHP) in the departments of Bouaké and San Pédro in Côte d'Ivoire was prospectively collected between April 2016 and March 2018. We identified 1594 patients at risk of rabies infection as eligible for RIG administration. Depending on local availability of eRIG and vaccination protocol applied, PEP consisted of active immunization only (non-eRIG group, n = 1145) or active and passive immunization (eRIG group, n = 449). Patients were followed-up by phone interviews at least 15 months after their exposure to assess for rabies suspected deaths.

Results: Follow-up data was available for 641 patients in the non-eRIG group (56%) and 242 in the eRIG group (54%). Three suspected or possible rabies deaths occurred in each of the two groups, corresponding to a possible rabies mortality of 1.2% (95% CI 0.3-3.6%) in the eRIG group and 0.5% (95% CI 0.1-1.4%) in the non-eRIG group. The difference in proportions was small and not statistically significant (0.7%, p = 0.21). Deaths in both groups were associated with treatment delay after exposure and non-compliance to PEP protocol. No death occurred after correct and timely active immunization independent of eRIG administration.

Conclusion: The provision of eRIG did not lead to a measurable reduction of rabies burden in our study population. This underlines that improved access to active vaccines will be effective in reducing rabies deaths even if access to eRIG remains difficult in developing countries. A possible benefit of eRIG administration for severely exposed patients cannot be excluded based on these results.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Cote d'Ivoire / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulins / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Compliance
  • Post-Exposure Prophylaxis / methods
  • Rabies / epidemiology*
  • Rabies / mortality
  • Rabies / prevention & control
  • Rabies Vaccines / immunology*
  • Vaccination

Substances

  • Immunoglobulins
  • Rabies Vaccines