Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to consider the anatomical basis and surgical technique along with the utility of buccal fat pad (BFP) for the reconstruction in cleft lip and palate patients.
Methods: We reviewed 27 cases of CLAP treated with BFP over three year period in our institution which included 2 cases of primary palatoplasty & 25 cases of secondary palatoplasty. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients operated by a single surgeon with a minimum follow up of 2yrs. Exclusion criteria included all syndromic cleft lip and palate patients. Predictor variables recorded were demographic characters, follow up period, type of cleft, type of surgical procedure, site & dimension of the fistula. Outcome variables of the study were post-operative fistula formation, post-operative hemorrhage & speech assessment.
Results: The study included 8 female & 19 male patients with mean age group 3.75 ± 1.75yrs. Cleft of soft palate & Lt. CLAP were the most common type of cleft. The surgical technique used was: BFP with V-Y pushback palatoplasty for primary palate repair, BFP with Furlow's technique for VPI correction, and BFP in conjugation with rotation flap, straight-line closure or redohardpalatoplasty for fistula closure. All cases showed satisfactory healing with favorable speech assessment outcomes for 18 patients (67%).
Conclusion: BFP along with other types of flap is the choice of treatment in cases of moderate defect owing to its favorable anatomic location & high vascularity. The size limitation of the BFP must be known to permit a successful outcome.
Keywords: Buccal fat pad; Furlow's technique; V–Y pushback Palatoplasty.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.