Comparison of sonoelastographic values of breast tissue with mammographically and ultrasonically assessed density: a cross-sectional study

Croat Med J. 2020 Jul 5;61(3):223-229. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.223.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the relationship between breast stiffness assessed with sonoelastography (elasticity) and breast tissue density assessed with mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US).

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 100 women who underwent MG, gray-scale US, and shear-wave sonoelastography during 2013. Mammographic density was categorized into four groups and sonographic density into three groups according to Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System criteria. The stiffness of breast parenchymal and adipose tissue in all breast quadrants was quantified by shear-wave sonoelastography. Mean elastographic estimates were compared with MG- and US-derived density estimates.

Results: Parenchymal and adipose tissue elasticity positively correlated with MG- and US-derived breast density (for parenchyma: for MG Kendall's tau b 0.522; Jonckheere-Terpstra test P<0.001 and for US Kendall's tau b 0.533; Jonckheere-Terpstra test P<0.001); the higher was the breast density on MG and US, the higher was the elastographic stiffness.

Conclusion: Sonoelastographic breast stiffness strongly positively correlated with breast density. Thus, sonoelastography may have a potential for estimating the breast cancer risk, which allows a novel application of this technique in routine clinical practice.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adipose Tissue / physiology*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Breast / diagnostic imaging*
  • Breast / physiology*
  • Breast Density / physiology*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Elasticity / physiology
  • Elasticity Imaging Techniques / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Parenchymal Tissue / physiology*
  • Ultrasonography
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary / methods*