Introduction and hypothesis: Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and pelvic floor repair (PFR) for the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are usually performed under regional anesthesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of performing VH and PFR under local anesthesia and to compare postoperative pain and patient recovery parameters with patients undergoing the same surgical procedure under regional anesthesia.
Methods: This was a single-center prospective cohort study of women with advanced POP. The standard care group consisted of 20 patients who underwent VH and PFR under a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) block, whereas the local anesthesia group consisted of 20 patients who underwent VH and PFR under local anesthesia and intravenous sedation. Primary outcomes included the intensity of postoperative pain and the percentage of patients with moderate/severe pain. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients who used opioids, incidence of nausea/vomiting, level of sedation, and patient satisfaction rate.
Results: The median pain intensity at rest was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group at 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h postoperatively (median values: 0 vs 1.9, 0 vs 4.1, and 1 vs 2.7 respectively). The percentage of patients needing opioids was significantly lower for the local anesthesia group (35% vs 95%, p = 0.002). The proportion of patients presenting nausea and vomiting symptoms in the two groups was similar.
Conclusions: Local anesthesia for patients undergoing VH and PFR has been shown to be a viable alternative to regional anesthesia, offering reduced postoperative pain and less opioid use for the first 8 h.
Keywords: ERAS; Local anesthesia; Opioid use; Postoperative pain; Regional anesthesia; Vaginal hysterectomy.