A high proportion of red snapper sold in North Carolina is mislabeled

PeerJ. 2020 Jun 25:8:e9218. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9218. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Seafood mislabeling occurs when a market label is inaccurate, primarily in terms of species identity, but also regarding weight, geographic origin, or other characteristics. This widespread problem allows cheaper or illegally-caught species to be marketed as species desirable to consumers. Previous studies have identified red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) as one of the most frequently mislabeled seafood species in the United States. To quantify how common mislabeling of red snapper is across North Carolina, the Seafood Forensics class at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill used DNA barcoding to analyze samples sold as "red snapper" from restaurants, seafood markets, and grocery stores purchased in ten counties. Of 43 samples successfully sequenced and identified, 90.7% were mislabeled. Only one grocery store chain (of four chains tested) accurately labeled red snapper. The mislabeling rate for restaurants and seafood markets was 100%. Vermilion snapper (Rhomboplites aurorubens) and tilapia (Oreochromis aureus and O. niloticus) were the species most frequently substituted for red snapper (13 of 39 mislabeled samples for both taxa, or 26 of 39 mislabeled total). This study builds on previous mislabeling research by collecting samples of a specific species in a confined geographic region, allowing local vendors and policy makers to better understand the scope of red snapper mislabeling in North Carolina. This methodology is also a model for other academic institutions to engage undergraduate researchers in mislabeling data collection, sample processing, and analysis.

Keywords: DNA barcoding; Fisheries; Red snapper; Seafood mislabeling.

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.11971461.v5

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Department of Biology at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and funded by the QEP (Quality Enhancement Plan) CURE (Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience) initiative. The project was also partially funded by the National Science Foundation (OCE #1737071 to John F. Bruno). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.