Intralipid therapy for unexplained recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: Case-series and literature review

Abstract

Introduction: In retrospective cohort study of women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and miscarriage (RM), we analyzed the efficacy and safety of intralipid therapy to obtain a live birth.

Patients and methods: Women with unexplained RM and/or RIF were included from 2015 to 2018 from three French university hospitals.

Results: Among 187 women treated for unexplained recurrent miscarriages and implantation failures, 26 women with median age of 36 years (29-43) received intralipid therapy. Among these 26 women, 10 women with a median age of 33 years (31-40) had a history of spontaneous recurrent miscarriages, with a median of 5 (4-8) previous miscarriages. Live births occurred in 7 (70 %) pregnancies under intralipids and were significantly more frequent than in women with recurrent miscarriages who did not receive intralipid therapy (n = 20, p = 0.02). Age, number of previous miscarriages, and additional therapies did not significantly differ between the two groups. Among the 26 included women, 16 had a history of recurrent implantation failures, with median age of 37 years (29-43) and median 9.5 (3-19) embryo transfers. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 9 (56 %) women receiving intralipids after embryo transfers under intralipids among which 5 (55 %) resulted in a live birth. Comparing successful pregnancies under intralipids with those with fetal loss, no significant differences have been noted.

Conclusion: Intralipids could be an effective and safe therapy in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriages and infertility.

Keywords: Implantation failure; Intralipids; Live birth; Recurrent miscarriages.