Hypocalcemia with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Disparity among Various Reports

Swarna Sri Nalluru; Paramarajan Piranavan; Ying Ning; Haritha Ackula; Ahmad D Siddiqui; Nitin Trivedi

doi:10.1155/2020/7459268

Hypocalcemia with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Disparity among Various Reports

Int J Endocrinol. 2020 Jun 6:2020:7459268. doi: 10.1155/2020/7459268. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Swarna Sri Nalluru¹, Paramarajan Piranavan², Ying Ning¹, Haritha Ackula¹, Ahmad D Siddiqui³, Nitin Trivedi⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts 01608, USA.
² Department of Rheumatology, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
³ Department of Hematology-Oncology, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts 01608, USA.
⁴ Department of Endocrinology, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts 01608, USA.

Abstract

Immune-related adverse events affecting parathyroid function are rarely reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs). Activating calcium-sensing receptor antibodies causing autoimmune hypoparathyroidism with nivolumab was recently reported. KEYNOTE-189 and CHECKMATE-067 trials reported a 21-29% hypocalcemia event rate, but the etiology of hypocalcemia was not reported. A chart review was performed to study patients receiving ICPI from 2015 to 2018 at multiple sites affiliated with Saint Vincent Hospital. The study population was divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of calcium altering conditions or medications. True hypocalcemia incidence was calculated after correcting calcium for albumin from the initiation of ICPI to their last follow-up. Group 1 (n = 83) includes patients with no calcium altering conditions or medications. Group 2 (n = 98) includes patients on calcium supplements (n = 17), vitamin D (n = 44), bisphosphonates (n = 24), >stage IIIB chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n = 5), and bone metastasis (n = 38). Hypocalcemia events in Group 1 vs. Group 2 were 8.4% and 19.3%, respectively. Our entire study demonstrated 26.8% vs. 1.1% of Grade I vs. II hypocalcemia events. However, after correcting the calcium for albumin, hypocalcemia incidence was 0.56% (n = 1). No further workup was done to investigate the etiology as that patient passed away. Our data suggest that the true hypocalcemia incidence after using albumin-corrected calcium values is very low in patients receiving IPCI, even in the presence of calcium altering factors. The percentage of patients with hypocalcemia is much higher and similar to the KEYNOTE-189 and CHECKMATE-067 trials when serum calcium values without albumin correction are used. Thus, the higher reported incidence of hypocalcemia in these trials is likely due to the reporting of serum calcium without albumin correction.