Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0235146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235146. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The recovery and analysis of ancient DNA and protein from archaeological bone is time-consuming and expensive to carry out, while it involves the partial or complete destruction of valuable or rare specimens. The fields of palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic research would benefit greatly from techniques that can assess the molecular quality prior to sampling. To be relevant, such screening methods should be effective, minimally-destructive, and rapid. This study reports results based on spectroscopic (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance [FTIR-ATR]; n = 266), palaeoproteomic (collagen content; n = 226), and palaeogenetic (endogenous DNA content; n = 88) techniques. We establish thresholds for three different FTIR indices, a) the infrared splitting factor [IRSF] that assesses relative changes in bioapatite crystals' size and homogeneity; b) the carbonate-to-phosphate [C/P] ratio as a relative measure of carbonate content in bioapatite crystals; and c) the amide-to-phosphate ratio [Am/P] for assessing the relative organic content preserved in bone. These thresholds are both extremely reliable and easy to apply for the successful and rapid distinction between well- and poorly-preserved specimens. This is a milestone for choosing appropriate samples prior to genomic and collagen analyses, with important implications for biomolecular archaeology and palaeontology.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Archaeology*
  • Bone and Bones / chemistry*
  • Bone and Bones / metabolism
  • DNA, Ancient / analysis*
  • DNA, Ancient / chemistry
  • Fossils*
  • Humans
  • Proteomics*
  • Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

Substances

  • DNA, Ancient

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.11653170
  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.11653194
  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.11653197
  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.12187575

Grants and funding

IK is grateful to Onassis Foundation (Grant no. F ZL 047-1/2015-2016), Leventis Foundation and the Greek Archaeological Committee UK (GACUK). KP thanks the Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2012-116), MJC thanks the DNRF for the award of a Niels Bohr Professorship (DNRF 128), and MJC and DGB thank the ERC Investigator grant 295729-CodeX. MU and CP were cofinanced by the EU Social Fund and the Greek national funds research funding program ARISTEIA II. MEA was funded by The Villum Foundation (Young Investigator Programme, grant no. 10120). IL is thankful for the partial funding support for this work, which is part of the Sino-Hellenic Academic Project, from the Key Research Institute of the Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center on the Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.