Effects of Nordic walking on cardiovascular performance and quality of life in coronary artery disease

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct;56(5):616-624. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06120-1. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

Abstract

Background: Cardiometabolic effects of physical exercise depend on its intensity, duration, and type. Conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation (CCVR) programs have significant advantages, but non-conventional activities such as Nordic walking (NW) may offer additional health benefits.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of NW on cardiovascular performance and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to a CCVR program.

Design: This was a pseudo-randomized, prospective, single-blinded, parallel-group trial.

Setting: The study was conducted at a resort/spa type facility located in a mountainous natural environment, 650 meters above sea level.

Population: Eighty-three CAD patients were allocated to either a Nordic walking or a control group.

Methods: The NW group (N.=53; age 59.1±7.0 years) underwent a three-week outdoor exercise program consisting of 40 minutes of walking four-times per week, whereas the controls performed traditional walking instead of NW. A patient's prescribed exercise intensity was according to exertion tolerance within 50-70% of peak oxygen consumption (VO<inf>2max</inf>); rating of perceived exertion 'mild/moderate' (12 to 14 points) on the 0-20 Borg Scale. Primary endpoint: cardiovascular and functional performance (exercise ergometry [EE], metabolic equivalent of tasks [METs], ejection fraction [EF], Six-Minute Walking Test [6MWT]). Secondary endpoint was quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey). Statistical analysis was performed by generalized estimating equations with Cohen's d effect size (ES).

Results: NW led to higher cardiovascular performance compared to CCVR (ΔEE: +11.0% vs. +3.2%, small ES; ΔMETs: +9.8% vs. +1.5%, medium ES) and better functional performance (Δ6MWT: +8.3% vs. +5.1%, small ES). No significant differences were detected in EF (P=0.240) and SF-36 (PCS, P=0.425; MCS, P=0.400).

Conclusions: A three-week NW training program had clinically important effects, above and beyond CCVR, on cardiovascular and functional performance in CAD patients.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: Nordic walking is an accessible, safe, and effective low-threshold cardiac rehabilitation exercise training modality that seems to be particularly well-suited for people with limited functional and motivational capacities.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life*
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Walk Test
  • Walking / physiology*