Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234248. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

When clothes are worn and washed, they emit fibres into the ecosystem via discharges of sewage that have been linked to the global dispersion of clothing fibres. Facilities that treat sewage divert some fibres from sewage effluent to sludge, but no current methods of filtration eliminate their environmental release. While filters for washing-machines are sold to consumers with the argument they will reduce the emissions of fibres from clothes to the environment, there is insufficient scientific peer-reviewed evidence assessing their ability to retain fibres from washed clothes and reduce environmental contamination. To improve our understanding and develop more realistic methods to assess the efficiency of filters, we washed replicate cotton and polyester garments in replicate domestic front-loaded washing-machines with and without replicate filters (micro- and milli-meter-sized pores), and then quantified the masses of the fibres retained by the filters and those released in the effluent. Here we show micrometer-sized filters significantly reduced the mass of cotton by 67% (F2,6 = 11.69, P<0.01) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters, whilst filters in general reduced polyester fibres in their effluent by more than 65% (micrometer-sized pores) and 74% (millimeter-sized pores) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters (F2,12 = 5.20, P<0.05). While filters with micrometer-sized pores caught larger masses and total proportions of fibres than filters with millimeter-sized pores, the differences were only significant for the total proportions of cotton (t = 4.799 df = 4, P<0.01). For tests with garments of either types of polymer, the filtered effluent still contained up to a third of the original masses of fibres released from the garments. Given the diversity of clothes, polymers, appliances and filters currently sold to consumers, our work shows the value of increasing the rigour (e.g. more levels of replication) when testing filters and the need for further studies that test an even greater diversity of materials and methods in order to meet the growing demand for knowledge from governments, industry and the public.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Filtration / instrumentation*
  • Laundering / instrumentation*
  • Polymers / chemistry*
  • Porosity
  • Sewage / chemistry*
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / chemistry
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / isolation & purification

Substances

  • Polymers
  • Sewage
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical

Grants and funding

MAB received funding in the form of a grant from Eileen Fisher (www.eileenfisher.com). MAB and ELJ received funding from Mosman Council (www.mosman.nsw.gov.au), NSW EPA (Waste Less, Recycle More initiative funded from waste-levy; https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/recycling-and-reuse/waste-less-recycle-more), Australian Research Council (DP150103272, LP170100313; www.arc.gov.au). MR received funding from Spanish Government fellowship (José Castillejo CAS17/00482; www.mecd.gob.es). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.