Rhizopogon vesiculosus and R. vinicolor are sister fungal species; they form ectomycorrhizas exclusively with Douglas-fir roots, and they are important in forming relatively large mycorrhizal networks, but they may be vulnerable to disturbance caused by logging practices. The main objective was to determine the resilience of mycorrhizal networks 25 years following removal of large hub trees. We predicted that the targeted removal of mature trees would reduce network connectedness compared with a non-harvested neighboring forest. Rhizopogon vesiculosus was nearly absent in the non-harvested plots, whereas both species were prominent in the harvested plots. Initially, network analysis was based only on networks formed by R. vinicolor because they were well represented in both treatments. These analyses showed that the R. vinicolor-Douglas-fir MN was more densely linked in the non-harvested plots than the harvested plots. When we accounted for differences in link and node density, there was still an edge difference and a greater vulnerability to fragmentation in harvested forests than in non-harvested forests. When both Rhizopogon sister species were included in the analysis, both treatments had similar connectivity and limited vulnerability to fragmentation. This suggests that when these forests transition from a regenerating to a non-regenerating state, the Rhizopogon network will lose R. vesiculosus but will maintain link density due to the colonization with R. vinicolor.
Keywords: Belowground resilience; Cryptic species; Fungal genotypes; Mycorrhizal networks; Selective logging.