Disentangling stimulus and response compatibility as potential sources of backward crosstalk

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3415-3431. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02039-6.

Abstract

In two experiments (N= 60 each), we investigated the locus of backward crosstalk effects in dual tasking. Specifically, we embedded the typical flanker task within a dual-task paradigm by assigning stimulus-response (S-R) rules to the flankers. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to first respond to the center letter and only respond to the flanker if the center was a no-go stimulus (i.e., prioritized processing paradigm). Mapping condition was varied between-subjects to be either matched (i.e., same S-R rule for flankers as for center letters), reversed (i.e., opposite S-R rule for flankers), or neutral (i.e., different letters for flankers with separate S-R rules). The results indicated that the backward crosstalk effect was mainly driven by a stimulus-based compatibility, as indicated by a significant S2-R1 compatibility effect in the matched and reversed conditions, with little change in this effect between the matched and reversed conditions. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings to a psychological refractory period paradigm. The present findings suggest that in the matched and reversed conditions, there was only one S-R rule active at a time.

Keywords: Backward crosstalk effect; Dual-tasking; Flanker task; Response compatibility; Stimulus compatibility.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Psychomotor Performance*
  • Reaction Time
  • Refractory Period, Psychological*