National temporal trends and determinants of cost of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Vascular. 2020 Dec;28(6):697-704. doi: 10.1177/1708538120930458. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, there has been a shift in the management of aortic abdominal aneurysm from open intervention (open aortic aneurysm repair) to an endovascular approach (endovascular aortic aneurysm repair). This shift has yielded clinical as well as socioeconomic reverberations. In our current study, we aim to analyze these effects brought about by the switch to endovascular treatment and to scrutinize the determinants of cost variations between the two treatment modalities.

Methods: The National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database was queried for clinical data ranging from 2001 to 2013 using International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes for open and endovascular aortic repair. Clinical parameters and financial data related to the two treatment modalities were analyzed. Temporal trends of index hospitalization costs were determined. Multivariate linear regression was used to characterize determinants of cost for endovascular aneurysm repair and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Results: A total of 128,154 aortic repairs were captured in our analysis, including 62,871 open repairs and 65,283 endovascular repairs. Over the assessed time period, there has been a decrease in the cost of elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from $34,975.62 to $31,384.90, a $3,590.72 difference (p < 0.01), while the cost of open aortic repair has increased from $37,427.77 to $43,640.79 by 2013, a $6,212.79 increase (p < 0.01). The cost of open aortic aneurysm repair disproportionately increased at urban teaching hospitals, where by 2013, it costs $50,205.59, compared to $34,676.46 at urban nonteaching hospitals, and $34,696.97 at rural institutions. Urban teaching hospitals were found to perform an increasing proportion of complex open aneurysm repairs, involving concomitant renal and visceral bypass procedures. On multivariate analysis, strong determinants of cost increase for both endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and open aortic aneurysm repair are rupture status, prolonged length of stay, occurrence of complications, and the need for disposition to a nursing facility or another acute care institution.

Conclusion: As the vascular community has shifted from an open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm to an endovascular approach, a number of unforeseen clinical and economic effects were noted. We have characterized these ramifications to help guide further clinical decision and resource allocation.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; endovascular aneurysm repair; health economics; health outcomes; medical cost containment; multivariate linear regression.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / economics*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / epidemiology
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / economics*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / trends
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Databases, Factual
  • Endovascular Procedures / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures / economics*
  • Endovascular Procedures / instrumentation
  • Endovascular Procedures / trends
  • Hospital Costs* / trends
  • Humans
  • Inpatients
  • Length of Stay / economics
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / economics*
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / trends
  • Patient Discharge / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States / epidemiology