Efficacy of the computer simulation-based, interactive communication education program for nursing students

Heeseung Choi; Ujin Lee; Ye Seul Jeon; Chanhee Kim

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104467

Efficacy of the computer simulation-based, interactive communication education program for nursing students

Nurse Educ Today. 2020 May 11:91:104467. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104467. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Heeseung Choi¹, Ujin Lee², Ye Seul Jeon², Chanhee Kim³

Affiliations

¹ College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; College of Nursing & The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: hchoi20@snu.ac.kr.
² College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
³ College of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, Republic of Korea.

PMID: 32464566
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104467

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based education using standardized patients or high fidelity patient simulators is resource-intensive and can be limited in its consistency and repeatability. Standardized, interactive, and effective computer simulation-based education programs that improve communication skills among nursing students are greatly needed.

Objectives: This study aimed to (1) compare the efficacy of a computer simulation-based, interactive communication education (ComEd) program and an attention control (AC) program on communication knowledge, learning self-efficacy, and communication efficacy at baseline and twice after the intervention (immediately after and two weeks after); and (2) assess the acceptability and satisfaction of the ComEd reported by the participants.

Design: This study employed a mixed-method, randomized controlled design with repeated measures.

Methods: Students were recruited from four nursing schools and randomly assigned to either the intervention or AC group. They received either the ComEd or AC program installed on a tablet PC or a desktop computer in the classrooms and completed a 15-item communication knowledge scale, 10-item learning self-efficacy scale, 22-item communication efficacy scale, and 14-item satisfaction scale. In addition, six open-ended questions were used to help participants reflect on their learning experiences and explore their satisfaction with the programs. The Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model was the main model employed to examine the effects of the ComEd program over time in comparison with the AC program, and the content analysis method was used for qualitative data.

Results: In total, 131 nursing students (66 in ComEd and 65 in AC) completed the programs and 127 participated through the two-week follow-up test. Compared to the AC group, the ComEd group significantly improved communication knowledge, learning self-efficacy, and communication efficacy; these effects were maintained at two weeks. The ComEd program was well accepted by the participants.

Conclusions: The ComEd is a promising approach because it is highly accessible, consistent, and repeatable, and has positive learning effects.

Keywords: Communication; Computer; Nursing education; Nursing students; Psychiatric nursing; Simulation.