Cognitive modelling reveals distinct electrophysiological markers of decision confidence and error monitoring

Neuroimage. 2020 Sep:218:116963. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116963. Epub 2020 May 24.

Abstract

Is confidence in perceptual decisions generated by the same brain processes as decision itself, or does confidence require metacognitive processes following up on the decision? In a masked orientation task with varying stimulus-onset-asynchrony, we used EEG and cognitive modelling to trace the timing of the neural correlates of confidence. Confidence reported by human observers increased with stimulus-onset-asynchrony in correct and to a lesser degree in incorrect trials, a pattern incompatible with established models of confidence. Electrophysiological activity was associated with confidence in two different time periods, namely 350-500 ​ms after stimulus onset and 250-350 ​ms after the response. Cognitive modelling revealed that only the activity following on the stimulus exhibited the same statistical regularities as confidence, while the statistical pattern of the activity following the response was incompatible with confidence. It is argued that electrophysiological markers of confidence and error awareness are at least in parts distinct.

Keywords: Cognitive modelling; Confidence; ERN/Ne; Event-related potentials; Metacognition; Pe.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Algorithms
  • Decision Making / physiology*
  • Electroencephalography
  • Electrophysiological Phenomena
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Female
  • Fixation, Ocular
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metacognition / physiology*
  • Models, Psychological*
  • Orientation
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Psychomotor Performance / physiology*
  • Self Concept
  • Young Adult