Objective: To compare the nutritional quality of children's combination meals offered at large US chain restaurants characterised by three versions - default (advertised), minimum (lower-energy) and maximum (higher-energy).
Design: We identified default children's meals (n 92) from online restaurant menus, then constructed minimum and maximum versions using realistic additions, substitutions and/or portion size changes for existing menu items. Nutrition data were obtained from the MenuStat database. Bootstrapped linear models assessed nutrition differences between meal versions and the extent to which meal components (main dish, side dish, beverage) drove differences across versions. For each version, we examined the proportion of meals meeting the Guidelines for Responsible Food Marketing to Children.
Setting: Twenty-six fast-food and fast-casual restaurants, in 2017.
Participants: None.
Results: Nutrient values differed significantly across meal versions for energy content (default 2443 kJ (584 kcal), minimum 1674 kJ (400 kcal), maximum 3314 kJ (792 kcal)), total fat (23, 17, 33 g), saturated fat (8, 6, 11 g), Na (1046, 915, 1287 mg) and sugar (35, 14, 51 g). The substitution of lower-energy beverages resulted in the greatest reduction in energy content (default to minimum, -418 kJ (-100 kcal)) and sugar (-20 g); choosing lower-energy side dishes resulted in the greatest reduction in total fat (default to minimum, -4 g), saturated fat (-1·1 g) and Na (-69 mg). Only 3 % of meals met guidelines for all nutrients.
Conclusions: Realistic modifications to children's combination meals using existing menu options can significantly alter a meal's nutrient composition. Promoting lower-energy items as the default option, especially for beverages and side dishes, has a potential to reduce fat, saturated fat and/or sugar in children's meals.
Keywords: Children’s meals; Combination meals; Nutrition guidelines; Restaurant.