Statement of problem: Which restorative material is best suited for treating the posterior molar region is unclear. As dentists presumably choose the most appropriate restoration, German dentists were asked how their own molars were treated.
Purpose: The purpose of this survey study was to examine molar restorations and their durability in German dentists.
Material and methods: In the official journal of the Federal Dental Association, German dentists were asked to participate in an online survey that gathered demographic data and information on the type and durability of their molar restorations. To reduce selection bias, the data were weighted for region, sex, and age of the dentist.
Results: The data set consisted of 1719 molars from 288 dentists. Restorations included gold inlays (25%), composite resin (24.3%), amalgam (11.8%), ceramic inlays (5.4%), glass ionomer cement or compomer (0.8%), gold crowns (21.8%), ceramic crowns (6.6%), and metal-ceramic crowns (4.3%). Notable differences were identified based on the sex, age, and region of the dentist. Women selected increased esthetic options, as did young dentists. Restorations made of gold, amalgam, and base metal had the highest longevity, at more than 20 years CONCLUSIONS: Among German dentists, restorations with metallic materials dominated in molars, with gold accounting for the largest share. In recent years, the proportion of tooth-colored restorations has increased, and in particular, young dentists use composite resin and ceramics.
Copyright © 2020 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.