Purpose: In our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing adenotonsillectomy (ATE) with adenopharyngoplasty (APP) in children with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there were no differences in respiratory sleep parameters or quality of life. The purpose of the present report was to evaluate postoperative morbidity from this RCT.
Methods: The study was a blinded RCT in 83 children (ATE = 47; APP = 36), 2-4 years of age, with an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index of ≥ 10. Pain was assessed from the first until the tenth day after surgery with a logbook that reported pain by child (FPS-R, Faces Pain Scale-Revised) and caregiver (visual analogue scale), analgesic use, return to normal diet, and weight change. Bleeding, infection, satisfaction with treatment, speech, and swallowing were assessed with a questionnaire and medical records 6 months after surgery.
Results: Sixty-four children (77%) returned the logbook and 65 (78%) answered the questionnaire. The median (interquartile range) day the children graded themselves as pain free (FPS-R = 0) was 7 (6-10) after ATE, compared with 9 (7 to > 10) after APP (p = 0.018). There were no other significant differences between the groups regarding any other pain-related outcomes, bleeding, infection, satisfaction, swallowing, or speech, but three children (11%) reported impaired speech after APP compared to none after ATE (p = 0.067).
Conclusion: The results regarding postoperative morbidity were in favor of ATE and the results from our previous report showed no advantages of APP. Therefore, APP should not be recommended in young, otherwise healthy children with OSA.
Keywords: Adenopharyngoplasty; Adenotonsillectomy; Obstructive sleep apnea; Pharyngoplasty; Tonsillar pillar closure; Tonsillectomy.