Impact of the angle between aortic and mitral annulus on the occurrence of hemolysis during Impella support

J Artif Organs. 2020 Sep;23(3):207-213. doi: 10.1007/s10047-020-01172-1. Epub 2020 May 14.

Abstract

Despite optimal management, we sometimes experience refractory hemolysis requiring extensive device speed reduction or continuous hemodiafiltration following Impella implantation. However, pre-procedural predictors of such a refractory hemolysis remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the pre-procedural factors, including the echocardiographic narrow angle between aortic and mitral annulus, associating with the occurrence of refractory hemolysis following Impella insertion. We enrolled 26 patients (71 years, 65% male) who received Impella insertion between March 2018 and November 2019. Among baseline characteristics, the angle between aortic and mitral annulus, < 126.5°, was an independent risk factor of refractory hemolysis with an adjusted hazard ratio of 7.840 (95% confidence interval 0.925-66.44) and was associated with lower 30-day survival (64% vs. 100%, p = 0.0116). The narrow angle between aortic and mitral annulus might be a useful tool to risk-stratify the occurrence of refractory hemolysis following Impella insertion.

Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve / diagnostic imaging*
  • Echocardiography
  • Female
  • Heart Failure / diagnostic imaging*
  • Heart Failure / pathology
  • Heart Failure / therapy*
  • Heart-Assist Devices / adverse effects*
  • Hemolysis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve / diagnostic imaging*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Shock, Cardiogenic / etiology
  • Treatment Outcome