Complications Following Orbital Floor Repair: Impact of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Scan and Implant Material

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 May 14. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0117. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Importance: Orbital floor fracture repair is complex and postoperative complications are common. A variety of applicable surgical techniques and technologies are available to surgeons, so data about which of these may decrease postoperative complication rates can help better guide clinical decision making. Objectives: To characterize the patient demographics and surgical techniques utilized in orbital floor fracture repairs at San Antonio Military Medical Center and their relationship with rates of postoperative complications. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent orbital floor fracture repairs from March 2014 to March 2019 with a mean follow-up time of 1.86 months at a tertiary care academic military hospital and level 1 trauma center. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic data, indication for surgical repair, fracture severity, orbital floor approach, implant material, and use of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scan were recorded. Chi-square analysis was performed to determine the relationship between these factors and postoperative diplopia, hypoglobus, enophthalmos, and infection. Results: A total of 124 procedures were performed during the study period: 71.8% of patients were male and 74% were civilian. Mean age was 39 years (range 19-81). Thirty-one patients were lost to follow-up. The most common approach was transconjunctival (83%), which was most frequently used exclusively (68.5%), but was also combined with cantholysis, transcaruncular, or transantral approach. Postoperative diplopia at follow-up was common (53.8%), resolved after an average of 36.3 days, and was significantly associated with surgical indication of entrapment or revision (p = 0.01) and nonutilization of intraoperative CT (p = 0.04). From 2014 to 2016, intraoperative CT was utilized in 21% of cases and revision rate was 10.5%. From 2017 to 2019, 50% of cases utilized intraoperative CT and revision rate was 2% (p = 0.15). Three cases were revisions performed for abnormal plate position noted on postoperative CT scan. Conclusions and Relevance: A statistically significant association was found between postoperative diplopia, surgical indication of entrapment or revision, and nonutilization of intraoperative CT. Revision rates decreased when use of intraoperative CT increased. Three revision cases may have been prevented by use of an intraoperative CT scan. Patients with entrapment should be counseled regarding the increased risk of postoperative diplopia.