Introduction: Contact hearing aids (CHA) offer potential advantages over conventional acoustic hearing aids (AHA) in terms of sound quality, reduced occlusion, and increased high-frequency gain. This study evaluates objective and subjective outcome data for CHA compared to AHA.
Methods: Clinical outcome data were retrospectively reviewed for patients wearing CHA. Individual and group data were analyzed and then compared to unaided and AHA data. Adverse effects, device complaints, and clinical utility were documented throughout the device fitting and follow-up process.
Results: CHA outcomes were better than unaided hearing and AHA for all patients completing the 3-month CHA trial period (45%). However, CHA return rate was high (55%), most often due to device repair and fit issues. Two patients returned the devices due to poor hearing benefit, though both were off-label audiometric candidates. Significantly more clinical time was required from both audiologists and otolaryngologists to successfully fit and maintain maximum device benefit.
Conclusions: For proper audiometric and otologic candidates, this light-driven CHA can offer significant improvements in high-frequency sound fidelity, word recognition, and sound quality compared to AHA technology. Administering questionnaires was helpful in illuminating real-world improvements. Device fit, alignment, and quality control issues are improving, though still contributing to high device return rates at this time. Operational factors should be considered when incorporating CHA into a hearing health care practice.
Keywords: Contact hearing aid; Hearing aids; Otology; Sensorineural hearing loss.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.