Despite considerable data from randomized controlled trials supporting use of behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders and anxiety-related disorders, there is a relative scarcity of data demonstrating that such findings are generalizable to patients in nonresearch settings, and a lack of standardized repeated outcome measurement in such settings. Using one of the largest examinations of naturalistic outcomes of behavioral therapies in treatment-seeking patients (N = 489), we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients seeking treatment for anxiety and anxiety-related disorders in the past 3 years. Patients seeking treatment at a clinic specializing in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) completed self-report questionnaires via an electronic data capture system and diagnostic interview at baseline, and were reassessed at mid- and posttreatment. Patients with anxiety and related disorders were assessed for changes in symptom severity and secondary outcomes (impairment/functioning, quality of life, and depression) over the course of therapy. Patients showed clinically significant and statistically reliable improvement in anxiety symptom severity scores over treatment (p < .001), after controlling for number of sessions received. Patients also showed significant improvement in depression, quality of life, and functioning (p values ≤ .001). We also found significant improvement in disorder-specific symptoms, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder (p values ≤ .001). Importance of, and ways to facilitate, integration of more routine assessment of a broader range of symptoms via online assessment systems and methods to better determine the effectiveness of CBT in naturalistic clinics are discussed.
Keywords: anxiety; computerized assessment; naturalistic treatment outcome; technology.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.