Economic burden in patients with ALK + non-small cell lung cancer, with or without brain metastases, receiving second-line anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors

J Med Econ. 2020 Aug;23(8):894-901. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1762620. Epub 2020 May 21.

Abstract

Aims: To describe the real-world economic burden of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy.Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis using data from US Optum: Clinformatics Data Mart administrative claims database. Adult patients with ALK + NSCLC treated with ceritinib or alectinib as second-line ALK inhibitors between 1 January 2011 and 30 September 2017 were included. Healthcare costs and resource utilization for up to 1 year of therapy were calculated on a per-patient-per-month (PPPM) basis and stratified by presence or absence of brain metastases (BM). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with costs. Top ten cost drivers of non-inpatient procedure costs were recorded.Results: One hundred and twelve patients received second-line ALK inhibitors. Total mean PPPM healthcare costs were $23,984 for all patients receiving up to 1 year of post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy. Total mean PPPM costs for patients with BM on or prior to post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy were 1.37-times as high as those for patients without BM (p = 0.0406). Mean PPPM outpatient visits and inpatient hospitalization stays were higher for patients with BM versus no BM. The main cost drivers for non-inpatient procedures were radiation therapy, medications, and diagnostic radiology.Limitations: Analyses did not include newer ALK-directed therapies. BM development after the index date (defined as the date of the first claim for a second-line ALK inhibitor) may have been misclassified as non-BM. Findings may not be generalizable to patients with no health insurance coverage.Conclusions: Treatment of patients with ALK + NSCLC with ceritinib or alectinib as post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy represents a high economic burden. Healthcare costs and resource utilization were significantly higher for patients with ALK + NSCLC with BM versus no BM.

Keywords: I10; I11; I19; Non-small cell lung cancer; anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive; brain metastasis; healthcare cost; treatment pattern.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase / antagonists & inhibitors*
  • Brain Neoplasms / secondary
  • Carbazoles / economics
  • Carbazoles / therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / drug therapy*
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / pathology
  • Comorbidity
  • Cost of Illness
  • Crizotinib / economics
  • Crizotinib / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Health Expenditures / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Resources / economics
  • Health Services / economics
  • Humans
  • Insurance Claim Review
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Piperidines / economics
  • Piperidines / therapeutic use
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors / economics*
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Pyrimidines / economics
  • Pyrimidines / therapeutic use
  • Regression Analysis
  • Residence Characteristics
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Sulfones / economics
  • Sulfones / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Carbazoles
  • Piperidines
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors
  • Pyrimidines
  • Sulfones
  • Crizotinib
  • Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase
  • ceritinib
  • alectinib