Current status in decision making to treat acute type A dissection: limited versus extended repair

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Jun;61(3):285-291. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11397-1. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

Abstract

Acute type A aortic dissection remains one of the most challenging conditions in aortic surgery. Despite the advancements in the field, the mortality rate still remains high. Though there is a general consensus that the ascending aorta should be replaced, the distal extension of the surgery still remains a controversy. Few surgeons argue for a conservative approach to reduce operative and postoperative morbidity while others considering the problems associated with "downstream problems" support an aggressive approach including a frozen elephant trunk. The cohort in the Indian subcontinent and APAC is far different from the western world. Many factors determine the decision for surgery apart from the pathology of the disease. Economy, availability of the suitable prosthesis, the experience of the surgeon, ease of access to the medical facility all contribute to the decision making to treat acute type A dissection.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aortic Aneurysm / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Aneurysm / surgery*
  • Aortic Dissection / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Dissection / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / instrumentation
  • Clinical Decision-Making*
  • Endovascular Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures* / instrumentation
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Patient Selection
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome