Interfering with influenza: nonlinear coupling of reactive and static mitigation strategies

J R Soc Interface. 2020 Apr;17(165):20190728. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0728. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

Abstract

When new, highly infectious strains of influenza emerge, global pandemics can occur before an effective vaccine is developed. Without a strain-specific vaccine, pandemics can only be mitigated by employing combinations of low-efficacy pre-pandemic vaccines and reactive response measures that are carried out as the pandemic unfolds. Unfortunately, the application of reactive interventions can lead to unintended consequences that may exacerbate unpredictable spreading dynamics and cause more drawn-out epidemics. Here, we employ a detailed model of pandemic influenza in Australia to simulate the combination of pre-pandemic vaccination and reactive antiviral prophylaxis. This study focuses on population-level coupling effects between the respective methods, and the associated spatio-temporal fluctuations in pandemic dynamics produced by reactive strategies. Our results show that combining strategies can produce either mutual improvement of performance or interference that reduces the effectiveness of each strategy when they are used together. We demonstrate that these coupling effects between intervention strategies are extremely sensitive to delay times, compliance rates and the type of contact targeting used to administer prophylaxis.

Keywords: agent-based model; antiviral prophylaxis; contact tracing; infectious disease; intervention; nonlinear dynamics.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use
  • Australia
  • Humans
  • Influenza Vaccines* / therapeutic use
  • Influenza, Human* / drug therapy
  • Influenza, Human* / epidemiology
  • Influenza, Human* / prevention & control
  • Pandemics / prevention & control

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Influenza Vaccines