Human exposure to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is inevitable due to the plethora of applications for which they are being manufactured and integrated within. ENMs demonstrate plentiful advantages in terms of industrial approaches as well as from a consumer perspective. However, despite such positives, doubts remain over the human health implications of ENM exposure. In light of the increased research focus upon the potential effects of ENM exposure to human health in recent decades, questions still remain regarding the safety of these highly advanced, precision-tuned physical entities. The risk of short-term, high-dose exposure to humans is considered relatively low, although this has formed the direction of the hazard-assessment community since the turn of the 21st century. However, the possibility of humans being exposed repeatedly over a long period of time to a low-dose of ENMs of varying physicochemical characteristics is of significant concern, and thus, industry, government, academic, and consumer agencies are only now beginning to consider this. Notably, when considering the human health implications of such low-dose, long-term, repeated exposure scenarios, the impact of ENMs upon the human immune system is of primary importance. However, there remains a real need to understand the impact of ENMs upon the human immune system, especially the innate immune system, at all stages of life, given exposure to nanosized particles begins before birth, that is, of the fetus. Therefore, the purpose of this perspective is to summarize what is currently known regarding ENM exposure of different components of the innate immune system and identify knowledge gaps that should be addressed if we are to fully deduce the impact of ENM exposure on innate immune function.