Diagnostic stewardship of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction results from syndromic diarrhea panel and implications for patient outcomes

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;97(2):115032. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115032. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

Abstract

Background: A syndromic gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIP) was implemented in May 2018. All positive (+) GIP and standard-of-care (SOC) C. difficile results were reviewed.

Methods: A single-center audit of adult patients with GIP results was conducted May-December 2018. We reviewed GIP(+)/SOC(+/-) and GIP(-)/SOC(-) tests (control group) for clinical outcomes.

Results: We reviewed 269 GIP(+) patients. Of 119 GIP(+)/SOC(+) patients, 44 (37%) were positive by toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay, and 75 (63%) by PCR only. Thirty-day mortality and re-admission were not significantly different between groups. CDI rates within 6 months were not significantly different between GIP(+)/SOC(-) and controls (p-value = 0.39). Those with initial SOC(+) tests had more true CDI events within 6 months, compared to controls (p-values < 0.001).

Conclusions: Forty percent of patients with GIP(+) C. difficile were (-) by SOC test, suggesting that true CDI was not present. Additional PCR-based testing may not impact outcomes.

Keywords: Clostridiodes difficile infection; diagnostic stewardship; gastrointestinal pathogen panel.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques
  • Clostridioides difficile / genetics*
  • Clostridium Infections / diagnosis*
  • Clostridium Infections / mortality
  • Diarrhea / microbiology*
  • Feces
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction*