Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231748. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), visual acuity (VA) measured with the Moorfields Vanishing Optotypes Acuity Charts (MAC), contrast sensitivity with the Pelli-Robson test, reading speed using the International Reading Speed texts (IReST) and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry (S-MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy). Groups were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ROC analyses. Linear regression was used to control for confounding. Results showed that all visual function test performances except the IReST were significantly reduced in iAMD patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). These effects did not alter after controlling for age and sex. Best discrimination between iAMD and controls yield the combination of LLVA and contrast sensitivity as well as MAC-VA and contrast sensitivity (ROC area under the curve 0.95 and 0.93, respectively). Our results suggest that LLVA, MAC-VA, contrast sensitivity and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry can capture visual impairment characteristic for iAMD. Best discrimination against iAMD is achieved with a combination of two tests.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Contrast Sensitivity
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dark Adaptation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Light
  • Linear Models
  • Macular Degeneration / diagnosis
  • Macular Degeneration / physiopathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Vision Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Vision Disorders / physiopathology
  • Vision Tests / statistics & numerical data
  • Visual Field Tests

Grants and funding

R.P.F.: Else Kröhner Fresenius Stiftung/German Scholars Organization (GSO/EKFS 16) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.