Sex-associated molecular differences for cancer immunotherapy

Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 14;11(1):1779. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15679-x.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade therapies have extended patient survival across multiple cancer lineages, but there is a heated debate on whether cancer immunotherapy efficacy is different between male and female patients. We summarize the existing meta-analysis to show inconsistent conclusions for whether gender is associated with the immunotherapy response. We analyze molecular profiling from ICB-treated patients to identify molecular differences for immunotherapy responsiveness. We perform comprehensive analyses for patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and reveal divergent patterns for sex bias in immune features across multiple cancer types. We further validate our observations in multiple independent data sets. Considering that the majority of clinical trials are in melanoma and lung cancer, meta-analyses that pool multiple cancer types have limitations to discern whether cancer immunotherapy efficacy is different between male and female patients. Future studies should include omics profiling to investigate sex-associated molecular differences in immunotherapy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Computational Biology / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy / methods*
  • Lung Neoplasms / genetics
  • Lung Neoplasms / therapy
  • Male
  • Melanoma / genetics
  • Melanoma / therapy
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Sex Characteristics