Evaluation of correlation between bioanalytical methods

Bioanalysis. 2020 Mar;12(6):419-426. doi: 10.4155/bio-2020-0019. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

Abstract

Bioanalytical methods evolve throughout clinical development timelines, resulting in the need for establishing equivalency or correlation between different methods to enable comparison of data across different studies. This is accomplished by the conduct of cross validations and correlative studies to compare and describe the relationship. The incurred sample reanalysis acceptance criterion seems to be adopted universally for cross validations and correlative studies; however, this does not identify any trends or biases between the two methods (datasets) being compared. Presented here are graphing approaches suitable for comparing two methods and describing equivalence or correlation. This article aims to generate awareness on graphing techniques that can be adopted during cross validations and correlative studies.

Keywords: Bland-Altman plots; bridging studies; concordance correlation coefficient; correlative studies; cross validations; deming regression.

MeSH terms

  • Biological Assay / methods*
  • Humans