Characterization of cold stress responses in different rapeseed ecotypes based on metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses

PeerJ. 2020 Mar 31:8:e8704. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8704. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The winter oilseed ecotype is more tolerant to low temperature than the spring ecotype. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses of leaf samples of five spring Brassica napus L. (B. napus) ecotype lines and five winter B. napus ecotype lines treated at 4 °C and 28 °C were performed. A total of 25,460 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the spring oilseed ecotype and 28,512 DEGs of the winter oilseed ecotype were identified after cold stress; there were 41 differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) in the spring and 47 in the winter oilseed ecotypes. Moreover, more than 46.2% DEGs were commonly detected in both ecotypes, and the extent of the changes were much more pronounced in the winter than spring ecotype. By contrast, only six DEMs were detected in both the spring and winter oilseed ecotypes. Eighty-one DEMs mainly belonged to primary metabolites, including amino acids, organic acids and sugars. The large number of specific genes and metabolites emphasizes the complex regulatory mechanisms involved in the cold stress response in oilseed rape. Furthermore, these data suggest that lipid, ABA, secondary metabolism, signal transduction and transcription factors may play distinct roles in the spring and winter ecotypes in response to cold stress. Differences in gene expression and metabolite levels after cold stress treatment may have contributed to the cold tolerance of the different oilseed ecotypes.

Keywords: Brassica napus; Cold stress; Metabolome; Molecular mechanisms; Transcriptomics.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Talent Introduction Program of Southwest University (SWU019008), The National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771830, 31701335), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0100202), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M653319), and the “111” Project (B12006). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.