Objective: Leadership is associated with organisational performance in healthcare, including quality, safety and clinical outcomes for patients. Leadership development programmes have proliferated in recent years. Nevertheless, very few have examined participant experiences in depth in order to understand which programmatic aspects they regard as most valuable relative to leadership in increasingly complex systems, or whether and how learnings may sustain over time. Accordingly, we explored experiences of participants in an interdisciplinary leadership development programme using qualitative methods over an extended look-back period.
Setting: Health and social care sectors in the UK.
Participants: Key informants from three cohorts of individuals working in leadership roles in health and social care in the UK: 2013/2014, 2015/2016 and 2017/2018. We contacted 32 participants, and 26 completed interviews (81% response rate).
Primary and secondary outcomes: We explored (1) whether and how specific skills and competencies developed during the programme were applied and/or sustained over time, and (2) whether and how the impact of the programme changed as alumni progressed through their career.
Results: Three major recurrent themes emerged from participants' experiences: (1) specific features of the programme meaningfully impact professional development at multiple levels; (2) the coupling of a professional network and practical tools allowed participants to address system-wide problems in new ways and (3) participants describe a level of learning that sustained and amplified over time with increased complexity in their work.
Conclusion: This work highlights specific design characteristics of leadership development programmes that may help promote relevance and impact. Programme learnings can be translated into practice in substantive ways, with potential for the benefits of successful leadership development efforts to amplify, not fade, over time.
Keywords: medical education & training; public health; qualitative research.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.