Physiological rationale of commonly used clinical exercise tests

Pulmonology. 2020 May-Jun;26(3):159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.10.004. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

Abstract

In order to measure cardiopulmonary performance for clinical and investigation purposes we need standardized tests which allow the comparison with standard values, between people, or individuals with themselves over time. The quest for the ideal exercise test has led to the development of several formats, the so called laboratory and field tests. Incremental exercise tests allow measurement of maximal exercise capacity and a host of submaximal variables of great interest. The physiological rationale of the tests and of the detection of interesting submaximal variables can be explained from the oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide output kinetic response to constant power exercise. When the muscles have to produce very high energy, the exercise is physiologically limited to relatively short duration. The minimum power at which an exercise can no longer be sustained for long periods of time is called critical power. Above critical power the time-power function shows a hyperbolic shape. This shape provides the rationale for understanding the properties, limitations and responsiveness to interventions of endurance tests such as constant power test on a cycle-ergometer or treadmill, endurance shuttle walk test and six-minute walk test.

Keywords: Carbon dioxide output kinetics; Endurance tests; Exercise testing; Oxygen uptake kinetics; Six-Minute walk test.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Carbon Dioxide / metabolism
  • Ergometry / methods
  • Ergometry / statistics & numerical data
  • Exercise / physiology*
  • Exercise Test / instrumentation
  • Exercise Test / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Kinetics
  • Oxygen / metabolism
  • Oxygen Consumption / physiology*
  • Physical Endurance / physiology
  • Physical Functional Performance
  • Walk Test / methods

Substances

  • Carbon Dioxide
  • Oxygen