Laparoscopic surgery for early gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu Feng; Jia-Sheng Cao; Ming-Yu Chen; Bin Zhang; Sarun Juengpanich; Jia-Hao Hu; Win Topatana; Shi-Jie Li; Ji-Liang Shen; Guang-Yuan Xiao; Xiu-Jun Cai; Hong Yu

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1074

Laparoscopic surgery for early gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

World J Clin Cases. 2020 Mar 26;8(6):1074-1086. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1074.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China.
² Department of General Surgery, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
³ Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China. 3195016@zju.edu.cn.

Abstract

Background: There is a controversy as to whether laparoscopic surgery leads to a poor prognosis compared to the open approach for early gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach is an alternative for early GBC.

Aim: To identify and evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of early GBC.

Methods: A comprehensive search of online databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane libraries, and Web of Science, was performed to identify non-comparative studies reporting the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and comparative studies involving laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in early GBC from January 2009 to October 2019. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 5-year overall survival and postoperative complications, while 3-year overall survival, operation time, blood loss, the number of lymph node dissected, and postoperative hospital stay were analyzed by random-effects models.

Results: The review identified 7 comparative studies and 8 non-comparative studies. 1068 patients (laparoscopic surgery: 613; open surgery: 455) were included in the meta-analysis of 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival with no significant differences observed [(HR = 0.54; 95%CI: 0.29-1.00; I ² = 0.0%; P = 0.051), (HR = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.34-1.65; I ² = 60.7%; P = 0.474), (HR = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.47-1.08; I ² = 49.6%; P = 0.107), respectively]. There were no significant differences in operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 18.69; 95%CI: -19.98-57.36; I ² = 81.4%; P = 0.343], intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -169.14; 95%CI: -377.86-39.57; I ² = 89.5%; P = 0.112), the number of lymph nodes resected (WMD = 0.12; 95%CI: -2.95-3.18; I ² = 73.4%; P = 0.940), and the complication rate (OR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.30-1.58; I ² = 0.0%; P = 0.377 ) between the two groups, while patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD = -5.09; 95%CI: -8.74- -1.45; I ² = 91.0%; P= 0.006).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis confirms that laparoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery with comparable survival and operation-related outcomes for early GBC.

Keywords: Early gallbladder carcinoma; Laparoscopic surgery; Meta-analysis; Open surgery; Survival.