The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study

BMC Oral Health. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01093-8.

Abstract

Background: The posterior regions of the jaws usually represent a significant risk for implant surgery. A non-valid assessment of the available bone height may lead to either perforation of the maxillary sinus floor or encroachment of the inferior alveolar nerve and consequently to implant failure. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of surgeon's decision in appraising the appropriate implant length, in respect to vital anatomical structures, using panoramic radiographs.

Methods: Only implants that are inserted in relation to the maxillary sinus (MS) or the mandibular canal (MC) were enrolled (first premolars [1P], second premolars [2P], first molars [1M], and second molars [2M]). All preoperative panoramic radiographs were evaluated under standard conditions. The postoperative estimation (under/over) was determined depending on the available bone height (ABH) measured from the apical end of the implant to the floor of the MS and the roof of the MC using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Any complication or side effect that associated with overestimated implants insertion was recorded.

Results: The study sample included 73 patients (predominantly females) who had consecutively received 148 implants, of which 68 were inserted in the posterior maxilla and 80 in the posterior mandible. Underestimation was recorded in 93.2% of the measurements. The remaining bone height after implants insertion was < 2 mm in the majority of underestimated cases (73.9%); they were significantly (P < 0.01) more than sites with remaining bone ≥ 2 mm (26.1%). In the posterior mandible, overestimation was significantly higher than posterior maxilla. Five cases with transient paresthesia were reported in the mandibular overestimated implants.

Conclusions: This study specified that surgeon's choice of implants length, based on panoramic radiographs, was reliable regarding the incapability to insert implants with further length in the majority of underestimated cases, the low percent of overestimated measurements, and the minor associated complications.

Keywords: Dental implant; Inferior alveolar nerve; Mandibular canal; Maxillary sinus; Panoramic radiographs.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Alveolar Process / diagnostic imaging
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / methods
  • Dental Implants*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Jaw, Edentulous / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Mandibular Nerve / diagnostic imaging
  • Maxilla / diagnostic imaging*
  • Maxillary Sinus / diagnostic imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiography, Panoramic / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surgeons*

Substances

  • Dental Implants