Verbal, physical, and relational peer victimization: The role of immigrant status and gender

Psicothema. 2020 May;32(2):214-220. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.236.

Abstract

Background: Most studies suggest that immigrant youth are more likely to be victimized than their non-immigrant counterparts. In Italy, a country in which the number of foreign migrants has grown exponentially over recent decades, this line of research is particularly interesting. Thus, the main objective of the present study was to examine the relationship between peer victimization, gender, and immigrant status in a large sample of students.

Method: The research used data from a cross-sectional Italian survey on the "Integration of Second Generations", which was administered to 68,127 students in grades 6 through 13 (49% female; 47% immigrant). Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between immigrant status and gender with verbal, physical, and relational victimization, after adjusting for socio-demographic variables.

Results: Immigrant and male participants were more likely to be classified as frequently victimized. The significant interaction effect between immigrant status and gender revealed that male immigrant students were more likely to belong to the frequently relationally victimized category compared to their counterparts.

Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of including immigrant status disparities in peer victimization research. Prevention efforts and intervention strategies should be implemented to create safe environments in Italy.

MeSH terms

  • Acculturation
  • Adolescent
  • Bullying / psychology*
  • Bullying / statistics & numerical data
  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Emigrants and Immigrants / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Peer Group*
  • Physical Abuse / psychology*
  • Sex Factors*
  • Verbal Behavior*