Construction and reliability and validity tests of the dietary self-management ability scale for kidney transplant recipients

Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;9(2):352-358. doi: 10.21037/apm.2020.03.07. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

Abstract

Background: To establish a dietary self-management evaluation indicators scale for kidney transplant recipients and to test the reliability and validity of the scale.

Methods: Based on the knowledge attitude practice model (KAP model) of health-related behavior changes, an evaluation indicators scale of dietary self-management ability of kidney transplant recipients was constructed through a literature review, expert consultation and group discussion. A questionnaire survey was carried out with 102 kidney transplant recipients from a large tertiary hospital to test the reliability and validity of the constructed scale.

Results: The dietary self-management ability scale for kidney transplant recipients had 29 items in 3 dimensions. The content validity at the scale level was 0.969, and the content validity at the item level was 0.778-1.000. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 68.610%; the correlation coefficient between each dimension was 0.467-0.629, and the correlation coefficient between each dimension and the total score of the scale was 0.648-0.845. Cronbach's α for the scale was 0.831, and the test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.910.

Conclusions: The constructed dietary self-management ability scale for kidney transplant recipients has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool to evaluate the dietary self-management ability of kidney transplant recipients.

Keywords: Kidney transplantation; diet; reliability; self-management; validity.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Diet Surveys / standards*
  • Diet, Healthy / methods*
  • Female
  • Health Behavior
  • Humans
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Care / methods*
  • Self-Management / methods*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards