Critical methodological considerations in recruiting and engaging non-native English speaking workers with a head injury: a Canadian perspective

BMC Res Notes. 2020 Mar 30;13(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05028-y.

Abstract

Objective: Non-native English speaking workers with a mild work-related traumatic brain and/or head injury are a vulnerable and underrepresented population in research studies. The researchers present their experiences with recruiting and performing qualitative interviews with non-native English speaking individuals with a work-related mild traumatic brain injury, and provide recommendations on how to better include this vulnerable population in future research studies. This paper presents considerations regarding ethics, recruitment challenges, interview preparation and debriefing, sex & gender and language and cultural issues must be made when working with this vulnerable population.

Results: The researchers discuss critical issues and provide recommendations in recruiting and engaging with non-native English language workers including ethics, recruitment challenges, interview preparation and debriefing, sex & gender and language, and cultural considerations that must be made when working with this population. The study recommendations advise investigators to spend more time to learn about the non-native English participants in the mild wrTBI context, to be familiar with the vulnerabilities and specific circumstances that these workers experience. By increasing their awareness of the challenging facing this vulnerable population, the intention is to provide better care and treatment options through evidence-based research and practice.

Keywords: Head injury; Interviews; Methodological considerations; Occupational injury; Qualitative; Traumatic brain injury.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomedical Research* / ethics
  • Biomedical Research* / standards
  • Canada
  • Craniocerebral Trauma*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Cultural Competency*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interview, Psychological* / methods
  • Interview, Psychological* / standards
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Injuries*
  • Ontario
  • Patient Selection* / ethics
  • Qualitative Research
  • Researcher-Subject Relations* / ethics
  • Self Report
  • Vulnerable Populations