"Now that PrEP is reducing the risk of transmission of HIV, why then do you still insist that we use condoms?" the condom quandary among PrEP users and health care providers in Kenya

AIDS Care. 2021 Jan;33(1):92-100. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1744507. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

Abstract

Communication around condom use in the context of PrEP services presents a potential conundrum for patients and providers. Within the Partners Scale-Up Project, which supports integration of PrEP delivery in HIV care clinics, we interviewed 41 providers and 61 PrEP users and identified themes relating to condom messaging and use. Most providers counselled PrEP initiators to always use both PrEP and condoms, except when trying to conceive. However, others reported contexts and rationales for not emphasizing condom use. Providers reported that PrEP users were sometimes confused, even frustrated, with their insistence on using condoms in addition to PrEP. PrEP users generally regarded PrEP as a more feasible and desirable HIV prevention method than condoms, enabling increased sexual pleasure and conception, and reducing the conflict and stigma associated with condom use. Innovative approaches to condom counselling in PrEP programs are needed.

Keywords: HIV serodiscordant couples; Kenya; PrEP scale up; condoms; health care providers; public HIV care clinics.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Condoms / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / prevention & control*
  • HIV Infections / transmission
  • Health Personnel / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Kenya
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis / methods
  • Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis / statistics & numerical data*
  • Qualitative Research
  • Sexual Partners