Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators: A review of evidence and indications

Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Apr;31(3):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

Abstract

The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) was first approved for clinical use in 2002, and is routinely used in select populations at high risk for sudden cardiac death. WCDs are frequently considered as a bridge to definitive therapy or in circumstances where insertion of conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is temporarily contraindicated. In this review, we summarize the literature on WCDs. From prospective trials to the first randomized controlled trial with WCD, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests that the WCD is safe and effective. In the first randomized controlled trial of the WCD (VEST Trial), there was no reduction in arrhythmia death but there was a reduction in all-cause mortality. We discuss the mortality impact, rate of inappropriate shocks, compliance, and potential quality of life implications with the WCD. Finally, we present the evidence for WCD use in select populations (e.g., post-myocardial infarction, device extraction), and the current guideline recommendations for WCD use.

Keywords: Sudden cardiac death; Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / mortality
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / physiopathology
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / therapy*
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Death, Sudden, Cardiac / prevention & control*
  • Defibrillators*
  • Electric Countershock / adverse effects
  • Electric Countershock / instrumentation*
  • Electric Countershock / mortality
  • Equipment Design
  • Humans
  • Patient Selection
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wearable Electronic Devices*