Introduction: Decision support tools (DST) may aid compliance of teams with the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) algorithm but have not been adequately tested in this population. Furthermore, the optimal team size for neonatal resuscitation is not known. Our aim was to determine whether use of a tablet-based DST or team size altered adherence to the NRP algorithm in teams of healthcare providers (HCPs) performing simulated neonatal resuscitation.
Method: One hundred nine HCPs were randomized into a team of 2 or 3 and into using a DST or memory alone while performing 2 simulation scenarios. The primary outcome was NRP compliance, assessed by the modified Neonatal Resuscitation Performance Evaluation (NRPE). Secondary outcomes were the subcomponents of the NRPE score, cumulative time error (the cumulative time in seconds to perform resuscitation tasks in error, early or late, from NRP guidelines), and the interaction between DST and team size.
Results: Decision support tool use improved total NRPE score when compared with memory alone (p = 0.015). There was no difference in NRPE score within teams of 2 compared with 3 HCPs. Cumulative time error was decreased with DST use compared with memory alone but was not significant (p = 0.057). Team size did not affect time error.
Conclusions: Teams with the DST had improved NRP adherence compared with teams relying on memory alone in 1 of 2 scenarios. Two and 3 HCP teams performed similarly. Given the positive results observed in the simulated environment, further testing the DST in the clinical environment is warranted.