Aims: His-Purkinje system pacing has been demonstrated as a synchronized ventricular pacing strategy via pacing His-Purkinje system directly, which can decrease the incidence of adverse cardiac structure alteration compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of His-Purkinje system pacing and RVP in patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction dysfunction.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched from the establishment of databases up to 15 December 2019. Studies on long-term clinical outcomes of His-Purkinje system pacing and RVP were included. Chronic paced QRS duration, chronic pacing threshold, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), all-cause mortality, and heart failure hospitalization were collected for meta-analysis.
Results: A total of 13 studies comprising 2348 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with RVP group, patients receiving His-Purkinje system pacing showed improvement of LVEF (mean difference [MD], 5.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.38-6.92), shorter chronic paced QRS duration (MD, - 39.29; 95% CI, - 41.90 to - 36.68), higher pacing threshold (MD, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and lower risk of heart failure hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96) during the follow-up. However, no statistical difference existed in LVEDV, LVESV and all-cause mortality between the two groups.
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that His-bundle pacing is more suitable for the treatment of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction dysfunction.
Keywords: His bundle pacing; His-Purkinje system pacing; clinical outcomes; left bundle branch pacing; meta-analysis.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.