Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function

J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Apr;27(2):397-409. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02074-8. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Abstract

Rationale: We aimed to define the impact of variable arterial input function on myocardial perfusion severity that may misguide interventional decisions and relates to limited capacity of 3D PET for high-count arterial input function of standard bolus R-82.

Methods: We used GE Discovery-ST 16 slice PET-CT, serial 2D and 3D acquisitions of variable Rb-82 dose in a dynamic circulating arterial function model, static resolution and uniformity phantoms, and in patients with dipyridamole stress to quantify per-pixel rest and stress cc·min-1·g-1, CFR and CFC with (+) and (-) 10% simulated change in arterial input.

Results: For intermediate, border zone severity of stress perfusion, CFR and CFC comprising 7% of 3987 cases, simulated arterial input variability of ± 10% may cause over or underestimation of perfusion severity altering interventional decisions. In phantom tests, current 3D PET has capacity for quantifying high activity of arterial input and high-count per-pixel values of perfusion metrics per artery or branches.

Conclusions: Accurate, reproducible arterial input function is essential for at least 7% of patients at thresholds of perfusion severity for optimally guiding interventions and providing high-activity regional per-pixel perfusion metrics by 3D PET for displaying complex quantitative perfusion readily understood ("owned") by interventionalists to guide procedures.

Keywords: Quantitative myocardial perfusion; cardiac PET.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Arteries / diagnostic imaging*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Circulation
  • Exercise Test
  • Heart / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging / methods*
  • Perfusion
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Rubidium Radioisotopes*
  • Software

Substances

  • Rubidium Radioisotopes
  • Rubidium-82