Assessing the Effect of Mycotoxin Combinations: Which Mathematical Model Is (the Most) Appropriate?

Toxins (Basel). 2020 Feb 29;12(3):153. doi: 10.3390/toxins12030153.

Abstract

In the past decades, many studies have examined the nature of the interaction between mycotoxins in biological models classifying interaction effects as antagonisms, additive effects, or synergisms based on a comparison of the observed effect with the expected effect of combination. Among several described mathematical models, the arithmetic definition of additivity and factorial analysis of variance were the most commonly used in mycotoxicology. These models are incorrectly based on the assumption that mycotoxin dose-effect curves are linear. More appropriate mathematical models for assessing mycotoxin interactions include Bliss independence, Loewe's additivity law, combination index, and isobologram analysis, Chou-Talalays median-effect approach, response surface, code for the identification of synergism numerically efficient (CISNE) and MixLow method. However, it seems that neither model is ideal. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these mathematical models.

Keywords: Chou-Talalay method; Loewe additivity; MixLow; combination index; isobologram; mycotoxin interaction.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Drug Interactions
  • Humans
  • Models, Biological*
  • Mycotoxins / toxicity*

Substances

  • Mycotoxins