Background: Current practice patterns and opinions regarding subspecialization within pediatric surgery are not well known. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of and attitudes surrounding subspecialization within pediatric surgery.
Methods: An anonymous survey regarding subspecialization was distributed to all nonresident members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association.
Results: Of 1118 surveys, we received 458 responses (41%). A majority of respondents labeled themselves 'general pediatric surgeons' (63%), while 34% considered themselves general surgeons with a specific clinical focus, and 3% reported practicing solely within a specific niche. Subspecialists commonly serve as consultants for relevant cases (52%). Common niches included oncology (10%) and anorectal malformations (9%). Subspecialists felt to be necessary included transplant (79%) and fetal (78%) surgeons. Opinions about subspecialization were variable: 41% felt subspecialization improves patient care while 39% believe it is detrimental to surgeon well-roundedness. Only 10% felt subspecialists should practice solely within their subspecialty. Practicing at an academic hospital or fellowship program correlated with subspecialization, while length of time in practice did not.
Conclusion: While pediatric surgeons report that subspecialization may benefit patient care, concerns exist regarding the unfavorable effect it may have on the individual surgeon. A better understanding of how subspecialization affects quality and outcomes would help clarify its utility.
Type of study: Review article.
Level of evidence: Level V.
Keywords: Pediatric surgery; Specialization; Subspecialization.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.