Objectives were to compare ovarian responses and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Angus-cross beef heifers (n = 521; 4 locations) synchronized with CIDR-CO-Synch (CCOS) versus CIDR-GnRH-CO-Synch (CGCOS) protocols. Heifers were assigned a reproductive tract score (RTS: 1, immature, acyclic; 5, mature, cyclic), body condition score (BCS: 1, emaciated; 9, obese) and temperament score (0, calm, 1, excitable). Heifers in the CCOS (n = 261) group received a CIDR on Day -20 (removed on Day -13), 100 μg GnRH on Day -10, 25 mg PGF2α on Day -3 and were timed inseminated 60 h later, with concomitant GnRH (Day 0). Heifers in the CGCOS (n = 260) group received a CIDR on Day -26 (removed on Day -19), 100 μg of GnRH on days -16 and -10, 25 mg of PGF2α on Day -3 and were timed inseminated 60 h later, with concomitant GnRH (Day 0). Ovarian ultrasonography was done in a subset of heifers (n = 60; 30 in each group) to determine number and size of ovarian follicles and presence of corpus luteum (CL). There was increased (P < 0.05) percentage of heifers with CL in CGCOS group compared to heifers in CCOS group on Day -10 (82.3 vs 68.2%) and on Day -3 (88.3 vs 75.1%). Average size of the largest ovarian follicle on Day 0 was greater for heifers in CGCOS group compared to CCOS group (P < 0.05). However, P/AI did not differ between CCOS and CGCOS groups, 55.0% (143/260) and 59.8% (156/261), respectively (P > 0.1). In conclusion, CIDR presynchronization with or without GnRH (CCOS and CGCOS protocols) in beef heifers resulted in similar P/AI. Adding GnRH to presynchronization with CIDR resulted in more heifers with a CL at PGF2α and increased preovulatory follicle diameter at AI. Future studies are needed with bigger sample size and CIDR + CO-Synch treatment as control to determine economic benefit.
Keywords: Artificial insemination; CO-Synch; Cattle; Pregnancy rate; Presynchronization; Progesterone.
Published by Elsevier Inc.